August 25, 2015
Dr. Gene V. Glass, a seminal figure in the field of educational psychometrics and data mining has had enough. According to his blog post republished on the Washington Post's Answer Sheet blog, this pioneer in the field of education statistics is "no longer comfortable being associated with the discipline of educational measurement."
This is a man who actually developed the term and process "meta-analysis," which is the statistical procedure of combining the results of multiple smaller studies into one larger analysis to try to get more information and reliability from greater numbers.
Glass described his history and the history of psychometrics in general:
My mentors both those I spoke with daily and those whose works I read had served in WWII. Many did research on human factors -- measuring aptitudes and talents and matching them to jobs. Assessments showed who were the best candidates to be pilots or navigators or marksmen. We were told that psychometrics had won the war; and of course, we believed it
The next wars that psychometrics promised it could win were the wars on poverty and ignorance. The man who led the Army Air Corps effort in psychometrics started a private research center. (It exists today, and is a beneficiary of the millions of dollars spent on Common Core testing.) My dissertation won the 1966 prize in Psychometrics awarded by that man's organization. And I was hired to fill the slot recently vacated by the world's leading psychometrician at the University of Illinois. Psychometrics was flying high, and so was I.
In the emphasized language above, Glass appears quite likely to be describing the American Institutes for Research (AIR), which has definitely received not just millions of dollars, but hundreds of millions of dollars from states and the federal government for the Common Core tests (an advertised $220 million from Florida alone). Glass is also probably describing their studies on fighter pilots that included AIR founder John Flanagan's research for the racist Pioneer Fund. Flanagan, as described in our article
about the eugenics work of AIR and Flanagan:
Flanagan summarized the work of the Pioneer Fund this way in his proposal
for first major research project - the eugenics experiment involving the birth rates of U.S. Army Air Corps pilots in the 1930's when African Americans were not allowed to be pilots:
"My understanding is that the fundamental purpose for which the Pioneer Fund was created is the improvement of the human race. The general method chosen to further this end is to secure an increase in the birth rate among superior groups."(Emphasis added).
The data sheet
which was intended to gather information for this project, asked the Junior officers and their wives for their "Race Descent (Name the four principal racial stocks with portion or approximate portions of blood from each)
. (Emphasis added)"
Glass also said that he has resisted the effort to use grades on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP):
Around 1980, I served for a time on the committee that made most of the important decisions about the National Assessment of Educational Progress. The project was under increasing pressure to "grade" the NAEP results: Pass/Fail; A/B/C/D/F; Advanced/Proficient/Basic. Our committee held firm: such grading was purely arbitrary, and worse, would only be used politically.
The contract was eventually taken from our organization and given to another that promised it could give the nation a grade, free of politics. It couldn't.
Glass rightly points out that grading is political even for the academic questions on the NAEP. How much more so will it be used politically now that the NAEP is about to be used to assess and eventually grade the completely subjective and non-academic factors like "grit" and "mindsets"?
In addition, he takes a not so subtle swipe at the corporate cronyism so well exemplified by Pearson without mentioning the publishing giant's name and then explains that this has destroyed education and his desire to be involved in psychometrics:
The test company lobbyists convince politicians that grading teachers and schools is as easy as grading cuts of meat. A huge publishing company from the UK has spent $8 million in the past decade lobbying Congress. Politicians [like Jeb Bush] believe that testing must be the cornerstone of any education policy.
The results of this cronyism between corporations and politicians have been chaotic. Parents see the stress placed on their children and report them sick on test day. Educators, under pressure they see as illegitimate, break the rules imposed on them by governments. Many teachers put their best judgment and best lessons aside and drill children on how to score high on multiple-choice tests. And too many of the best teachers exit the profession.
When measurement became the instrument of accountability, testing companies prospered and schools suffered. I have watched this happen for several years now. I have slowly withdrawn my intellectual commitment to the field of measurement. Recently I asked my dean to switch my affiliation from the measurement program to the policy program. I am no longer comfortable being associated with the discipline of educational measurement.
Renowned psychologist Dr. Gary Thompson said the following on the Utahns Against Common Core Facebook page
about Dr. Glass' post:
Mankind (e.g., "Bill Gates, Secretary Duncan, AIR, USOE, or Superintendent Smith, etc) will never create a form of data analysis more accurate and informative than what can be garnered from the combination of a mother, a well trained local teacher & Principal, and valid, personalized, private, assessment tools interpreted by a professional with one, and only one motive in mind:
To lift the academic, emotional, and spiritual foundation of a child for the sake of the joy of enrichment.
Assessments, as well as the associated meta data generated by our current Common Core based educational system, will never be able to be used as a valid measure of teachers, schools, or as a tool to achieve the mythical political term of "career & college ready"....or to support the political desires of our current Governor and Utah's Chamber of Commerce.
"Parents are, and must always be the resident experts of their own children".
The testing/data pseudo-science spewing from the lips of the educational/political bureaucracy, can't change this very law of nature and the universe.
August 21, 2015
Republican Senators Ted Cruz (TX) and Rand Paul (KY) earned the best grades of A- while not surprisingly, former Governor Jeb Bush and current Ohio Governor John Kasich received failing grades for their positions and actions on Common Core. The graded review of 16 Republican candidates was done by the American Principles in Action group. The full report card is available HERE.
The report was based on how well candidates by their statements and actions have answered three questions:
1.) Have they spoken out and acted against Common Core?
Statements opposing Common Core must acknowledge that the standards are of low-quality, fail to meet the expectations of high-performing countries, and contain language that controls the curriculum and instructional methods used in the classroom. Recognition of these deficiencies is central in determining whether a candidate's actions have been a sincere effort to replace the Common Core with high standards or to simply rebrand it under another name.
2.) Do they understand and have they made a specific commitment to protect state and local control of education from further federal intrusion?
In particular, we are looking for candidates who understand how the federal government intrudes onto state decision-making and who advocate for structural changes to prevent such intrusions. Moreover, the candidate must understand that the intended division of power between the federal government and the state is meant to ensure that people can shape state and local policies. He must understand how the breakdown of that division destroyed the safeguards that could have, and likely would have, prevented Common Core.
3.) What efforts has the candidate made to protect student and family privacy interests against the rising demands of industry and central planners for more personal student data?
Such interests include the right of parents to control what type of information is collected (e.g., social and emotional information, behavioral history, family information), who may collect such information, and with whom that information may be shared. Reliance on the Family Educational Rights to Privacy Act (FERPA) to protect student data is no longer a sufficient argument for calls against expanding student-data systems. A 2009 executive order allowed regulatory changes to be made to weaken the law, such as the removal of language requiring parental consent, without Congressional consent. A candidate must understand how this is symptomatic of a larger issue: the federal executive's continued abuse of the intended system of governance in order to push its favored policies and practices into the states.
Here are the grades for each of the candidates and links to a full explanation of how they were graded by APIA along with some FSCCC commentary for each one. We will start with the Florida candidates:
F ... Jeb Bush
The plethora of information on this website
and our Facebook page
should leave no doubt that former Governor Bush's failing grade on Common Core is very well deserved. Our GOP debate analysis
, the news that he worked closely with the Obama administration
to spread the cancer of Common Core, his admission that the Florida Standards are basically a rebrand
, and our rebuttal to his recent foundation speech
are just some examples. His most recent efforts to temper his support by saying that he opposes federal involvement
and calling Common Core "poisonous"
are not believable as shown by the general panning of his debate performance
and his falling poll numbers in recent CNN
and Quinnipiac polls
since that debate. Bush's polling problems are likely worsened by his stance on immigration
, his personal
and family history
of involvement in organizations that support Planned Parenthood, and his most recent statements that the NSA should do more spying on Americans
B- ... Ben Carson
Dr. Carson believes strongly in local control of education and school choice. He has spoken against Common Core, but needs to expand his research, understanding, and speaking about this vital issue. He has not had the opportunity to actually take action against the standards, for student data privacy or for a smaller federal footprint in education yet. Given his experience in medicine, it is quite likely that he does understand the importance of privacy. He also will need to understand the dangers of school choice programs
that require the state (mostly Common Core) tests for "accountability" purposes.
C ... Marco Rubio
The Florida senator has consistently been against Common Core in speeches and the first debate when he has had the chance to discuss the issue. He is also to be thanked for voting against the final ECAA/No Child Left Behind
rewrite and for Senator Cruz's amendment on testing state sovereignty. Let us hope he improves in the area of privacy by pulling back on his "Know Before You Go Act"
which will require a boatload of student data mining and that he supports Senator Vitter's bill privacy bill.
C ... Mike Huckabee
As described in our debate analysis
and the cartoon below, former Arkansas Governor Huckabee's positions on Common Core have been problematic. Let us hope that his current fervent opposition to Common Core is sincere and more than just words. Given his calls in 2013 to rebrand the standards as Governor Scott did in Florida, we think the C grade is extremely generous.
A- ... Ted Cruz
FSCCC would add that Senator Ted Cruz has been rock solid
on his opposition to Common Core and has never wavered. One does not need to parse his statements. We also appreciate his vote against ECAA, the Senate No Child Left Behind
rewrite, as well as his amendment attempt to that bill to return testing decisions to the states. We hope that he considers co-sponsoring Senator David Vitter's Student Privacy Protection Act
or draft some other student privacy protection legislation that includes protection against psychological profiling, which we believe would turn his excellent A- grade to a stellar A+.
A- ... Rand Paul
FSCCC also appreciates Senator Rand Paul's clear, consistent opposition
to Common Core as well as his efforts to defund the US Department of Education
(2012 S. Con Res. 42
), his past work in other bills to protect children from psychological profiling, and realization of how bad ECAA
was after initially voting for it coming out of the Senate HELP committee on which he sits by voting against the final bill and trying to amend it regarding testing. He too could improve his great grade by expanding his previous work on student psychological privacy to not just ask for consent, but to prohibit this extremely invasive
, unconstitutional and unethical activity.
B+... Bobby Jindal
Governor Jindal's opposition to Common Core has been strong and consistent after initially supporting the standards and his words have been matched by actions,
which we submit have helped the citizens of Louisiana and further isolated Jeb Bush on this issue.
B ... Lindsey Graham
Senator Graham has also acted in opposition to Common Core, but needs to expand his actions, clarify his opposition and really come strongly out against any conference committee report on the No Child Left Behind rewrite that will cement Common Core, especially since he did not vote on the Senate bill
itself or any of the amendments and support Senator Vitter's privacy bill
or something equally strong.
B ... Rick Perry
Former Texas Governor Perry has always also been a strong opponent of Common Core as governor of one of the few states that rejected it and Race to the Top funds from the beginning. His grade would probably be an "A" were it not for the student data sharing bill that he signed. Let us hope he clarifies that issue and talks further about how he would devolve power to the states and districts and protect data and psychological privacy.
B ... Rick Santorum
Former Senator Santorum (PA) has fairly solid record on education. He voted for No Child Left Behind
while in the Senate but has admitted that that as a mistake. He did speak against Common Core when running for president in 2012 and has continued that effort in this campaign, including the very important effort of speaking against the very poor quality of the standards. It is hoped that he will continue and expand on that as well as flesh out what he would do to protect student data and psychological privacy.
B- ... Donald Trump
The New York celebrity tycoon has consistently spoken against Common Core from the beginning of his 2016 presidential aspirations. As described by APIA, he will need to get more specific on discussing Common Core's academic inferiority, how he will work against the standards, federal interference in education and student data mining.
C+... Carly Fiorina
Mrs. Fiorina was highly complementary of Race to the Top when she ran for the US Senate in California in 2010, the first year that the Race to the Top grants were offered and the year that the standards were being written. The standards were not even complete until sometime during May of that year and approved by many states by an August deadline in order to get points for the grant competition. So while this statement from her senate campaign
website is disappointing, it is not at all surprising given her big business background and the date of 11/4/09 that some of this statement was put together, which was well before the standards were released. She has since opposed the Common Core
in her presidential campaign after learning what the standards are and what they do. Since she has not held elected office, she will have to clarify her positions as the campaign continues.
D+... Chris Christie
While happy that the New Jersey governor is now opposing the standards, he is quite recent to that conversion
, which some say is politically motivated, and he was quite disparaging of parents who had concerns. We hope that he continues to improve, but now he has to contend with his corporate elite donors'
concern about his change of heart.
D+... Scott Walker
The Wisconsin governor has done well on certain aspects of education, but his history with Common Core as described by the parents and citizens of the Badger State
is at best complicated and at worst disingenuous. Walker's Department of Education also accepted Race to the Top Early Learning Challenge grant money
and its website admits their pre-K standards are aligned to Common Core
. It is outrageous to be expanding and imposing Common Core on young children. We strongly agree with the grade that he received with APIA.
F ... John Kasich
The Ohio governor remains arrogantly and militantly in support of Common Core. He disparages parents
and seems to be acting as a foil to Jeb Bush who is attempting to appear slightly more conservative in his continued stubborn support and willingness to "lose the primary in order to win the general election." Kasich and Bush differ very little from Hillary Clinton on this critical issue. Kasich is only doing well
in his home state of Ohio.